If you wanted to buy a new car, and you went
and spoke to a sales person at a particular car
dealership, he would undoubtedly try to sell
you one of the models that his particular
dealership stocks. In this situation,
wouldn't it be a better idea for the
prospective buyer to rather get input,
independent of the sales person, regarding his
particular brand of car, or for that matter
input from someone that might be able to
tell him whether or not it might be more
appropriate for him to buy either a bicycle
or a motorbike as opposed to a car.
Home Equity Release loans are no different.
Representatives of Home Equity Release loan
providers
will undoubtedly tell consumers about the
virtues of their own products. The problem is
that they are potentially conflicted in providing
this advice, as consumers might be able to
get a better deal by approaching an
alternative Home Equity Release provider, or
for that matter, considering a totally
different approach that might not include
the use of Home Equity Release products.
Furthermore, in the event of customers
making use of Home Equity Release products,
the implications of using these products can
be onerous in terms of inheritance, estate
duty and other financial planning issues.
As a consequence of the above, before taking
out a Home Equity Release loan, you should
ensure that you receive appropriate advice
from an suitably qualified financial
adviser that is independent of the loan
provider.
As a minimum, in order to be accredited by
SAHERPA, loan providers need to commit to
ensuring that advice is provided to their
prospective customers by independent
financial advisers that are at least "fit
and proper" in terms of FAIS. We believe that such an
approach will help customers fully
understand not only the risks and
implications of the transaction that they
are considering, but also the other
alternatives that are available to them.
Consumers should be concerned in the event
of a Home Equity Release loan provider not
requiring the customer to consult with an
independent third party in order to assess
the appropriateness of the offering. |